When Libby developed the radiocarbon dating technique, he validated the method by comparing measured carbon ratios (carbon-14/carbon-12) from artifacts of known age with predictions of the ratio expected by assuming the decay rate.This article appears on the American Scientific Affiliation website. For best viewing of the entire article, please click here (opens a new browser window).The short answer is a resounding YES and here’s why.The concept behind radiocarbon dating is rather simple.Radioactive decay causes once-living specimens to lose half of their C14 atoms in about each 5,730-year half-life.
In the presentation speech for the 1960 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, one scientist described the work by honoree Willard Libby with these words: “Seldom has a single discovery in chemistry had such an impact on the thinking of so many fields of human endeavour.
Sponsored Products are advertisements for products sold by merchants on
When you click on a Sponsored Product ad, you will be taken to an Amazon detail page where you can learn more about the product and purchase it.
However, when one starts with the Bible and interprets the information received from carbon dating accordingly, one will soon learn that in no way does carbon dating disprove the young earth.
Misconception # 1: Carbon dating can be used to date objects that are millions or even billions of years old Carbon dating is one of the most popular radioactive dating methods used today.